Is terrorism ever justified Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Is holy terrorism ever justified - Essay ExampleIt is, by its nature, defined and thought to be wrong no matter which society or which culture. Even within war, terror tactics are usually command out by the principles of justice in war. This is because the destructive force is deliberately aimed at innocent targets. The just war doctrine says that it might be permissible to harm innocent civilians if this harm is an unintentional side effect of a legitimate military goal. Terrorists are not concerned about morality or the ethics of the terrorist act. In fact, they deliberately seek to attack these very concepts in order to draw attention to themselves and highlight their actions in order to realize their goals. Baljit Singh (1990) wrote that terror incorporates two facets, namely a state of fear within and individual or a group and the tool that induces the state of fear. These very dimensions to the terrorist acts are inherently inhumane and illegitimate tainting its end results no matter how successful they are. One should remember that the masses do not rally to terrorist causes.If terrorism is successful in using terror to shape public policy, then our world would be plunged into chaos as the line between what is right and wrong in conflicts is blurred. The 2004 capital of Spain bombing which killed 200 people and killing thousands more led to the installation of a party to power that might not otherwise be elected. (Jenkins 2004, p. 21) We alike have the successes of terrorist organizations to remove democratic governments such as those in Uruguay and Argentina. If these trends are left unchecked, groups will be emboldened to use it as an instrument to accomplish political end and that some states could inevitably sanction the same terrorist strategies in order to combat either domestic opposition or influence global affairs.There are scholars who argue that terrorism is an aggrieved group resorting to violence for nationalist or separatist reasons a nd that it could be considered as